About the "manifest and obvious" unconstitutionality of parliamentary papers Commentary on Constitutional Court's Judgements 115/2019, of October 16, and 128/2019, of November 11. Concerning the appeals for legal protection nums. 3846-2018 and 2114-2018. (BOE num. 279 and 304, of November 20 and December 19, 2019)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper addresses judgments 115/2019 of October 16, and 128/2019 of November 11, issued by the Constitutional Court. These two judgments confirm the jurisprudence which establishes the power of the Chamber Bureaus to find parliamentary papers inadmissible that are “manifest and obviously” unconstitutional and the obligation to find those initiatives whose admission involves a manifest breach of the judgments of the Constitutional Court also inadmissible. The study includes the background of the judgments, their analysis and conclusions.
Downloads
Article Details
Keywords
How to Cite
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Congress of Deputies. The original copies published in the online and printed versions of this Journal constitute the property of the Cortes Generales, recognizing the need to refer to the authorship and source of every partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise specified, all contents of the online version are distributed under a distribution and usage license: “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)”. You can check the informative version and the legal document of the license freely.