Reasoned decision of inadmissibility of a parliamentary oral question which did not pertain to the government’s action but to the funding of the political party of its President. Commentary on Constitucional Court Judgment 68/2020, of June 29. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 4869-2018. (BOE num. 207, of July 31, 2020)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The First Chamber of the Constitutional Court decides to dismiss an appeal for legal protection submitted by the spokesperson of a parliamentary group of the Regional Assembly of Murcia. The Constitutional Court argues that there is no violation of the appellant’s right to exercise their representative functions, given that the decision of the Parliament’s Bureau to declare inadmissible a question with oral reply in the Plenary, which was addressed to the President of the Governing Council of the Region of Murcia and did not pertain to the Government’s action but to the funding of the political party of the President, was a reasoned decision.
Downloads
Article Details
Keywords
How to Cite
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Congress of Deputies. The original copies published in the online and printed versions of this Journal constitute the property of the Cortes Generales, recognizing the need to refer to the authorship and source of every partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise specified, all contents of the online version are distributed under a distribution and usage license: “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)”. You can check the informative version and the legal document of the license freely.