Available commentaries on the Constitutional Court Judgments 66/2021, of March 15, by Esther de Alba Bastarrechea, 53/2021, of March 15, by Isabel María Abellán Matesanz, and STJUE of February 25, 2021 (Case C-658/19), by Ignacio Navarro Mejía

Posted on 2021-10-27

The following comments on Parliamentary Jurisprudence are available for reading in the «Preview» section of the website and will be included in issue num. 111 of the Revista de las Cortes Generales:

 

The infraction of the right to exercise representative public office by decisions of action and omission by the Presidency of the Parliament. Commentary on Constitutional Court´s Judgment 66/2021, of March 15, 2021. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 980-2020 (BOE num. 97, of April 23rd, 2021). (PDF [ficha]) (HTML [ficha])

Esther de Alba Bastarrechea

 

The exercise of representative public office: parliamentary legislative initiative vs. government budget veto . Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 53/2021, of March 15. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 6546-2018. (BOE num. 97, of April 23, 2021). (PDF [ficha]) (HTML [ficha])

Isabel María Abellán Matesanz

 

Failure to transpose a european directive on matter concerning organic law. Commentary on the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union of February 25, 2021. Case C-658/19. (PDF [ficha]) (HTML [ficha])

Ignacio Navarro Mejía