The Political Role of the European Court of Justice: How the EU Institutional Thresholds Shield the Integrationist Power of the Court
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyse how the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has been a fundamental factor in the integration process of the European Union, in spite of the obstacles posed by the intergovernmental dynamics that have traditionally hindered the construction of a stronger, cohesive and more integrated Europe. Important principles such as direct effect or supremacy of EU law have been developed through ECJ rulings and case law, even when such principles were not literally foreseen in the foundational Treaties. Therefore, this paper argues that the role and power of the Court as an “indirect law-maker” have been essential for the construction of the European Union, and this has been possible due to the complexities and weaknesses of the legislative process involving the three main decision-makers: the Commission, the Council of the EU, and the European Parliament.
Article Details
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Congress of Deputies. The original copies published in the online and printed versions of this Journal constitute the property of the Cortes Generales, recognizing the need to refer to the authorship and source of every partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise specified, all contents of the online version are distributed under a distribution and usage license: “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)”. You can check the informative version and the legal document of the license freely.
References
Arigho R. (2014). The Supremacy of European Union Law: An Inevitable Revolution or Federalism in Action? Journal of Postgraduate Research, Trinity College Dublin, 13, pp. 7-23. Recovered from: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/73628
Bickerton, C. J., Hodson D. & Puetter U. (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.001.0001
Blauberger, M. & Schmidt, S.K. (2017). The European Court of Justice and its political impact. West European Politics, 40 (4), pp. 907-918. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1281652
Cienfuegos Mateo, M. (2014). La cuestión prejudicial comunitaria (Artículo 267 del Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea). Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series, Jean Monnet Chair, University of Miami, 14 (1).
Conway, G. (2015). EU Law. New York: Routledge.
Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne. (2019). Rapport Annuel 2018. Activité Judiciaire. Luxembourg.
Craig, P. & Burca, G. (2011). EU Law. Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford University Press, Fifth Edition.
Hatzopoulos, V. (2013). Actively Talking to Each Other: The Court and the Political Institutions. In Mark Dawson, Bruno de Witte and Elise Muir (eds.), Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice. 102–141, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 6 October 1982 - Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Corte suprema di Cassazione - Italy. - Obligation to request a preliminary ruling. - Case 283/81. Recovered from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61981CJ0283
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 27 March 1963. - Da Costa en Schaake NV, Jacob Meijer NV, Hoechst-Holland NV v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tariefcommissie - Pays-Bas. - Joined cases 28 to 30-62. Recovered from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61962CJ0028
Kaczorowska-Ireland, A. (2016). European Union Law. New York: Routledge, Fourth edition.
Kallestrup, M. (2009). European integration and European Court of Justice. Can European Court of Justice be seen as a pro-integrative institution? University of Copenhagen.
Martinsen, D. S. (2015). The Court of Justice of the European Union: Master of Integration? In An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union. Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198753391.003.0002
Ritleng, D. (2016). The Independence and Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice. In Independence and Legitimacy in the Institutional System of the European Union. Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769798.003.0004
Sandholtz, W. & Stone Sweet A. (1998). European Integration and Supranational Governance, New York: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, S.K. (2000). Only an Agenda Setter? The European Commission’s Power over the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics, 1 (1), pp. 37–61.
Stone Sweet, A. & Brunell, T.L. (2012). The European Court of Justice, State Non-Compliance, and the Politics of Override. American Political Science Review, 106 (1), pp. 204-13.
Werner, B. (2016). Why is the Court of Justice of the European Union not more contested? Three Mechanisms of Opposition Abatement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54 (6), pp. 1449-1464. DOI:10.1111/jcms.12438