About the "manifest and obvious" unconstitutionality of parliamentary papers Commentary on Constitutional Court's Judgements 115/2019, of October 16, and 128/2019, of November 11. Concerning the appeals for legal protection nums. 3846-2018 and 2114-2018. (BOE num. 279 and 304, of November 20 and December 19, 2019)

Main Article Content

Francisco Javier de Piniés Ruiz

Abstract

This paper addresses judgments 115/2019 of October 16, and 128/2019 of November 11, issued by the Constitutional Court. These two judgments confirm the jurisprudence which establishes the power of the Chamber Bureaus to find parliamentary papers inadmissible that are “manifest and obviously” unconstitutional and the obligation to find those initiatives whose admission involves a manifest breach of the judgments of the Constitutional Court also inadmissible. The study includes the background of the judgments, their analysis and conclusions.

Article Details

Keywords:
assessment function of the Chamber Bureaus, “manifest and evident” unconstitutionality, execution of the judgments of the Constitutional Court
How to Cite
de Piniés Ruiz, F. J. (2020). About the "manifest and obvious" unconstitutionality of parliamentary papers: Commentary on Constitutional Court’s Judgements 115/2019, of October 16, and 128/2019, of November 11. Concerning the appeals for legal protection nums. 3846-2018 and 2114-2018. (BOE num. 279 and 304, of November 20 and December 19, 2019). Journal of the Cortes Generales, (108), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.33426/rcg/2020/108/1499

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Section
Reports and Parliamentary Case law with commentaries