The violation of parliamentary representation rights of mp´s because of not meeting convoking or not including items at the agenda Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 173/2020, of november 19. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 5084-2017. (BOE num. 332, of december 22, 2020)

Main Article Content

Luis Molina Moreno

Abstract

The judgement contributes to the definition of the right to access to public office of article 23.2 of the Spanish Constitution, concluding the, although the decisions of the Speaker and the Bureau of the Parliament could, moving along the meetings along the schedule or not including initiatives at the agenda, infringe the rights included as ius in officium of MP’s, actual initiatives must be concreted at petitum as well as the way the acts of those ones entailed deprivation of their functions exercise, as infractions cannot be declared abstractly.

Article Details

Keywords:
right of access to public office, right to participate in public affairs, ius in officium, control of Government action, ordinary plenary meetings, adoption of the agenda, omission, de facto proceeding
How to Cite
Molina Moreno, L. (2021). The violation of parliamentary representation rights of mp´s because of not meeting convoking or not including items at the agenda : Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 173/2020, of november 19. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 5084-2017. (BOE num. 332, of december 22, 2020). Journal of the Cortes Generales, (110), 521-529. https://doi.org/10.33426/rcg/2021/110/1584

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Section
Reports and Parliamentary Case law with commentaries