The extent of parliamentary immunity and its impact on individual rights Commentary to Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Green v. the United Kingdom, of 8 April 2025
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled on a case brought by an person who claims that several of his rights were violated as a result of statements made in the House of Lords of the United Kingdom, in which information was disclosed that was restricted by a court order.
The judgment carries out a balancing test based on constitutional principles, in contrast to the rights potentially affected. As a result, the Court determines that parliamentary prerogatives pursue a legitimate aim, impose certain restrictions on some rights that are proportionate, and that decisions regarding their scope and limits fall within the margin of appreciation of Member States in matters of parliamentary law.
Article Details
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Congress of Deputies. The original copies published in the online and printed versions of this Journal constitute the property of the Cortes Generales, recognizing the need to refer to the authorship and source of every partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise specified, all contents of the online version are distributed under a distribution and usage license: “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)”. You can check the informative version and the legal document of the license freely.