Considerations on Constitutional Jurisprudence in Parliamentary Matters
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the relationship between the Parliament and the Constitutional Court could be very limited parliamentary constitutional jurisprudence has been the basic constituent element of Parliament since the 1978 Constitution came into force. This jurisprudence has allowed drawing the essential features of the legislative procedure, configure and develop the ius in officium of the parliamentarians of art. 23.2 CE and arbitrate between the three states powers. Nevertheless, although in general the relationship between the Constitutional Court and Parliament has been peaceful, jurisprudence shows that, at times, there have been tensions between them. However, there are still pending issues to be resolved that affect the core of the functioning of our political-institutional system where both the Parliament and the Constitutional Court are called to play a central role.
Article Details
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Congress of Deputies. The original copies published in the online and printed versions of this Journal constitute the property of the Cortes Generales, recognizing the need to refer to the authorship and source of every partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise specified, all contents of the online version are distributed under a distribution and usage license: “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)”. You can check the informative version and the legal document of the license freely.