Transparency in the Cortes Generales
Main Article Content
Abstract
Openness is the natural evolution of transparency. The impetus for transparency experienced in these years must culminate in an Open Parliament that articulates the possibility of citizens to participate in parliamentary procedures. Active citizenship is a vital link between transparency and accountability. The Declaration on Parliamentary Openness affirms that it is this connection with the citizens that gives rise to a deeper parliamentary legitimacy. At an international level, we are working on platforms and tools for that Parliaments and civil society organizations can develop and implement plans of action on parliamentary openness. Spain has been a member since 2011 of the Open Government Partnership. His Open Government Guide has inspired many countries to initiate their action plan for parliamentary opennness. This will be the challenge of the Cortes Generales.
Article Details
Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Congress of Deputies. The original copies published in the online and printed versions of this Journal constitute the property of the Cortes Generales, recognizing the need to refer to the authorship and source of every partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise specified, all contents of the online version are distributed under a distribution and usage license: “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)”. You can check the informative version and the legal document of the license freely.
References
LOZANO GONZÁLEZ, C.L.: “Transparencia parlamentaria en el Distrito Federal”. BJV, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas-UNAM, 2016, pp. 47-74.
OSZLAK, O.: “Gobierno abierto: promesas, supuestos, desafíos”. Trabajo presentado en la VIII Conferencia Anual INPAE 2012: “Gobierno Abierto: Por una gestión pública más transparente, participativa y colaborativa”, San Juan de Puerto Rico, 25 de abril de 2012 (recurso digital).
RAMOS VIELBA, I.: “Nuevas tecnologías y transparencia parlamentaria: las organizaciones sociales de monitorización”. Panorama Social, número 18, segundo semestre 2013, pp.153-167.
RUBIO NÚÑEZ, R. (coord.): Parlamentos abiertos. Tecnología y redes para la democracia. Cuadernos del Congreso de los Diputados 9, Madrid, 2014.
RUBIO NÚÑEZ, R. y VELA NAVARRO-RUBIO, R.: El parlamento abierto en el mundo, evolución y buenas prácticas. 125 instrumentos de apertura parlamentaria. Colección Monografías nº 12, Fundación Manuel Giménez Abad de Estudios Parlamentarios y del Estado Autonómicos, Zaragoza, 2017.
SARMIENTO MÉNDEZ, X.A.: “La información y transparencia en los parlamentos españoles”. Corts. Anuario de Derecho Parlamentario, núm. 28, pp-105-132.
SCHEDLER, A.: “Conceptualizing Accountability”. The self-restraining state. Power and Accountability in New Democracies, edited by Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, Marc F.Plattner. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Boulder London, 1999, pp.13-29.
VELA NAVARRO-RUBIO, R.: El Parlamento abierto: la influencia de la tecnología en la evolución de la institución parlamentaria. E-Prints Complutense, Madrid, 2016.
VISIEDO MAZÓN, F. J.: “El principio de transparencia y el parlamento”. Constitución, política y administración: España 2017, Reflexiones para el debate. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2017. pp. 279-296.