Reports and Parliamentary Case law with commentaries

• Is proxy vote in regional Parliaments constitutional?

  Commentary on the Constitutional Court's Judgment num. 65/2022, of May 31, concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 2388-2018. (BOE num. 159, of July 4, 2022)

  Piedad García-Escudero Márquez

  559-575

• A new pronouncement of the Constitutional Court on the designation of senators, a new content of the right of the parliamentary groups to propose a candidate for senator according to proportionality

  Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment num. 56/2022, of April 5. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 3085-2019. (BOE num. 113, of May 12, 2022)

  Laura Seseña Santos

  577-602

• The suppression of parliamentary scrutiny by a regional budget law

  Commentary on the Constitutional Court's Judgment num. 16/2022, of February 8, concerning the action of unconstitutionality num. 2313-2020. (BOE num. 59, of March 10, 2022)

  Ignacio Navarro Mejía

  603-618

• Note on the legality of the Agreement adopted by the Bureau of the Senate, at its meeting on 17 March 2020, on the limitation of the convening of Senate Plenary sessions and committee meetings during the state of alarm

  Secretaría General del Senado

  423-435

• Criterion of equality or representativeness in the regulation of the Mixed Parliamentary Group

  Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 38/2022, of March 11. Concerning the Appeal for legal protection num. 4885-2020. (BOE num. 84 of April 8, 2022)

  Raquel Marañón Gómez

  437-451

• The election of the Bureau or the squaring of the circle

  Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 35/2022, of March 9. Concerning the Appeal for legal protection num. 4409-2019. (BOE num. 84, of April 8, 2022)

  María Garrote de Marcos

  453-472

• The duty to comply with the pronouncements of the Constitutional Court by the Bureau of Parliament in their powers of qualification of parliamentary initiatives

  Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 24/2022, of February 23. Concerning the Appeal for legal protection num. 4427-2020. (BOE num. 72, of February 25, 2022)

  Tatiana Recoder Vallina

  473-482

• The suspension of the Parliamentary position by application of article 384 bis of the Law of Criminal Procedure

  Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 171/2021, of October 7. Concerning the Appeal for legal protection num. 5382/2019. (BOE no. 268, of November 9, 2021)

  Paloma Martínez Santa María

  483-511

• The use of the rooms of the Congress of Deputies, a right of the members of Parliament?

  Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 137/2021, of June 29. Concerning the Appeal for legal protection num. 202-2019. (BOE num. 182, of July 31, 2021)

  Andrea García de Enterría Ramos

  513-525

• The role of the Senate and the limits to the regulation by Decree-Law in the process of designation of the management board of the Spanish Broadcasting Corporation and its president as a part of the Parliamentary control on social communications media

  Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 134/2021, of June 24. Concerning Appeal of unconstitutionality num. 3883-2018. (BOE num. 182, of July 31, 2021)

  M. ª Teresa González Escudero

  527-545