Esta web usa cookies propias y de terceros para ofrecerle una navegación más personalizada. Si continúa navegando, está aceptando el uso de las cookies. Para más información consulte la Política de Cookies.
This website uses its own and third-party cookies to guarantee you a more personalised browsing experience. If you continue browsing, you are accepting the use of cookies. For further information see the Cookies Policy.

ACEPTAR | Más información

Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

Revista Cortes Generales

  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial council
    • Editorial Team
    • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Numbers
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Parliamentary Jurisprudence
    • Published
    • Cuadernos de Jurisprudencia Parlamentaria
  • Announcements
  • Indexation
  • Contact

Reports and Parliamentary Case law with commentaries

This section includes contributions that provide an annotated summary of recent and most relevant judicial decisions related to Parliamentary Law, in order to facilitate their study and understanding.

 

  • The violation of parliamentary representation rights of mp´s because of not meeting convoking or not including items at the agenda

    Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 173/2020, of november 19. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 5084-2017. (BOE num. 332, of december 22, 2020)

    Luis Molina Moreno

    521-529

  • Note on the legal conformity of the agreement adopted by the Senate Bureau at its meeting of 17 march 2020, relating to the limitation of the call for plenary sessions and Senate committees during the state of alarm

    Secretaría General del Senado

    469-481

  • The conflict between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the Court Of Justice Of The European Union:

    commentary on the German Federal Constitutional Court, Second Senate [Bundesverfassungsgericht, Zweiten Senats] Judgment 2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 1651/15, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 980/16, of 5 May 2020

    Antonio Bar Cendón

    655-682

  • The implementation of article 155 of the Spanish Constitution.

    Commentary on the Supreme Court Judgment 277/2019, of March 4. Contentiousadministrative appeal num. 659/2017

    Ignacio Navarro Mejía

    641-653

  • Impact of the provisional prison on the fundamental right to the exercise of public office and other matters.

    Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgments 155/2019, of November 28, and 11/2020 and 12/2020, of January 28. Concerning the appeals for legal protection nums. 814-2018, 4855- 2018 and 5488-2018. (BOE nums. 5, of January 6, 2020, and 52, of February 29, 2020)

    Tatiana Recoder Vallina

    629-639

  • The provisional prison as a limit to the right to exercise representative public office.

    Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgments 155/2019, of November 28, 2/2020 and 4/2020, of January 15. Concerning the appeals for legal protection nums. 814-2018, 2115- 2018 and 2228-2018. (BOE nums. 5, of January 6, 2020 and 39, of February 14, 2020)

    Andrea García de Enterría Ramos

    613-628

  • Royal decree-laws limits. The “extraordinary and urgent need” requirement. Royal decree-laws legitimacy to regulate regulatory matters. Tax laws amendments by royal decree-laws.

    Commentary on the Constitutional Court Judgment 14/2020, of January 28. Concerning action of unconstitutionality num. 2208-2019. (BOE num. 52, of February 29, 2020)

    Isabel María Abellán Matesanz

    599-612

  • Suspension of investiture sitting due to provisional imprisonment of a candidate for President vs. representation and right to access to public office.

    Commentary on the Constitutional Court Judgment 23/2020, of February 13. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 3807-2018. (BOE num. 59, of March 9, 2020)

    Sara Sieira Mucientes

    583-598

  • The interpretation of article 23 of the Constitution and the content of the right to vote: a review.

    Commentary on Constitutional Court Judgment 66/2020, of June 29. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 4167-2017. (BOE num. 207, of July 31, 2020)

    Manuel Fernández-Fontecha Torres

    569-582

  • Reasoned decision of inadmissibility of a parliamentary oral question which did not pertain to the government’s action but to the funding of the political party of its President.

    Commentary on Constitucional Court Judgment 68/2020, of June 29. Concerning the appeal for legal protection num. 4869-2018. (BOE num. 207, of July 31, 2020)

    Fernando Castillo López

    555-568

  • ← Previous
  • 41-50 of 80
  • Next →

Open Access Review

Quality

Make a Submission

Language
  • English
  • Español (España)

Indexing

 

Plagiarism detection

Keywords

Links

Other publications

Journal policy
Focus and scope
Sections
Frequency of publication
Open access
ISSN: 0213-0130
eISSN: 2659-9678

Submission |
Steps for online submission
| Guidelines for authors |
Copyright
| Privacy statement
| Cookie policy

Editorial team |
Editorial board |
Advisors
| Contact:
Revistacortes@congreso.es
| Telephone: (+34) 91 390 60 00

General Secretariat of the Congress of Deputies.
Directorate of Studies, Analysis and Publications (Publications Department)
C/ Floridablanca, s/n
28071 Madrid (Spain)